Skip to main page content

Why we need Cognitive Architectures such as ACT-R for Cognitive Principles that enable dynamic & flexible Human-AI Interaction?

My Session Status

What:
Talk
Part of:
When:
1:30 PM, Thursday 4 Jun 2026 EDT (1 hour)
Theme:
Cognitive architectures

Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence have significantly improved the fluency and responsiveness of human–AI interaction. However, purely generative approaches remain insufficient for enabling dynamic and flexible interaction in real-world environments, which are inherently uncertain, evolving, and context-dependent. Effective interaction over extended periods requires structured representations, different forms of cognitive principles, and mechanisms for adaptive control. These principles and mechanisms are relevant for good and fluent Human-AI Interaction. Humans navigate such complex uncertain environments by leveraging mental models and a sense of control, continuously adjusting their actions based on perceived affordances and situational constraints.

This talk argues that cognitive architectures, such as ACT-R (Adaptive Control of Thought—Rational), provide a critical foundation for modeling these capabilities in AI systems. By integrating symbolic and subsymbolic representations, ACT-R enables the development of systems that can maintain and update mental models, reason over context, and adapt behavior in a goal-directed manner. Such architectures support continuity, coherence, and interpretability in interaction, particularly over longer time horizons as well as anticipation of the individual in a situation. We propose that combining generative AI with cognitive architectures offers a promising path toward more robust, human-aligned AI systems capable of meaningful, sustained collaboration in dynamic environments.

 

References

Kahl, S., Wiese, S., Russwinkel, N., & Kopp, S. (2022). Towards autonomous artificial agents with an active self: modeling sense of control in situated action. Cognitive Systems Research, 72, 50-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2021.11.005.

Prezenski, S., Brechmann, A., Wolff, S., & Russwinkel, N. (2017). A cognitive modeling approach to strategy formation in dynamic decision making. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1335. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01335.

Scharfe, M. S. L., Zeeb, K., & Russwinkel, N. (2020). The impact of situational complexity and familiarity on takeover quality in uncritical highly automated driving scenarios. Information, 11(2), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/info11020115.

Heinrich, N.W., Österdiekhoff, A., Kopp, S., & Russwinkel,N. (2025). Using Eye Movements to Understand Sense of Control in Situated Action, Cognitive Science , vol. 49, pp. e70154, 2025. Wiley Periodicals LLC, https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.70154.

Klaproth, O. W., Halbrügge, M., Krol, L. R., Vernaleken, C., Zander, T. O., & Russwinkel, N. (2020). A neuroadaptive cognitive model for dealing with uncertainty in tracing pilots' cognitive state. Topics in cognitive science, 12(3), 1012-1029. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12515.

 

My Session Status

Session detail
Allows attendees to send short textual feedback to the organizer for a session. This is only sent to the organizer and not the speakers.
When enabled, you can choose to display attendee lists for individual sessions. Only attendees who have chosen to share their profile will be listed.
Enable to display the attendee list on this session's detail page. This change applies only to this session.

Changes here will affect all session detail pages unless otherwise noted