Flexible Scales and Relational Territoriality in the Meaning-Making of Cultural Heritage
Mon statut pour la session
The idea of cultural heritage is commonly fixed to territories: heritage is often perceived and narrated as reflecting not only locally, regionally and nationally framed territorial meanings, but also those of supranational territorial entities such as cross-border or transnational regions and continents. The territorial meanings of cultural heritage are, however, situational and fluid: the territorial meanings of sites, objects and traditions recognized and labelled as cultural heritage vary in different discourses and contexts. For example, the same site, object or tradition can be defined as representing cultural heritage of different nations, depending on one’s point of view. Similarly, the same cultural heritage can be regarded as local, regional, national or supranational in different heritage discourses. Territorial definitions of cultural heritage are often intertwined with political agendas. Indeed, spatiality, scale and territoriality have a crucial role in producing, interpreting and governing cultural heritage. Usually, heritage administration, heritage politics and policies have a territorial focus and operational context. Although the geographies of heritage have raised increasing scholarly interest in the field of heritage studies, the difference that scale creates to the meanings of heritage has nevertheless been rarely investigated, as David Harvey has argued.
This session aims to promote the objectives of ACHS, an interdisciplinary approach and critical exploration of power relations involved in the production and meaning-making of cultural heritage. It addresses the main topic of the ACHS 2016 conference by discussing cultural heritage as a domain of power and politics—such as identity politics—and explores how imagined or real spaces, scales, territories and territorial borders are constructed, defined and managed in the processes of heritagization, and with what effects. The session tackles the following questions:
• How do space, scales and territoriality influence the meanings of cultural heritage?
• What kinds of power hierarchies, politics and conflicts of interpretation are implicated by the territorialisation of cultural heritage?
• What kinds of territorial top-down and bottom-up dimensions influence governing and meaning-making of cultural heritage?
The session will be divided in three parts:
Cultural Environment, Cultural and Natural Heritage, and Regionality;
Private and Public Spheres and Territoriality / De-Territoriality of Heritage;
Scales of Heritage and Identity Politics.
Sous sessions
When radio entered Canadian homes beginning in the 1920s and 1930s, it produced a new socio–spatial experience for listeners and became a key conduit and constituent of culture. The new electronic technology altered concepts of proximity and space by offering listeners the opportunity to travel the world, or connect with their neighbours, without leaving their homes. But radio was not (and is not) a purely de–territorialized and de–territorializing technology. Radio systems are predicated ...
In contemporary critical heritage research, heritage is complexly connected to the notions of identity (politics), community, politics, tourism, and globalized economy at large. Taking a discursive approach to heritage makes it possible to theorize the thick discursive network surrounding a specific heritage and the ways this heritage is used, performed, represented. This paper focuses on the Croatian intangible cultural heritage (UNESCO, enlisted in 2012) of klapa singing. More precisely,...
In different circumstances and at different times, the actions of countries, communities, and even individuals may be prioritized and celebrated, forgotten or silenced, or even re-packaged for different audiences. This can happen in order to conform to state-approved historical narratives, to privilege one group’s experience over another’s, to create distance from more shameful or painful events, to reconcile with past traumas, or simply to find a way to coexist in the present. Contested h...
The trans- and supranational dimensions of heritage have become topical in a new way in Europe, as the idea of a European cultural heritage has been more and more frequently referred to in the political discourses of the European Union and as the European Commission has recently launched several initiatives which aim to make the idea of a European cultural heritage more concrete. The idea of a common European cultural heritage emphasizes transcending local, regional, and national interpret...
The dedication of heritage by UNESCO has become a significant factor for many indigenous minorities. For this category, heritage emphasizes both continuity and change, that is peoples’ ability to preserve relevant historical sites and objects affirming ethnic identity collectively, as well as serving as an inspirational source for change. Referring to the Lapland’s Heritage Lapponia (1996), this paper will examine in what way this specific heritage has generated ethno-political mob...
Unaddressed national histories of perpetration produce hidden narratives, likely to live under the surface, festering as open wounds, only to compromise the true vitality of any nation for years to come. Memorials provide historic perspective and seek to restore a sense of hope to nations carrying histories of perpetration. “Public Acts of Remembrance” details my experience of establishing a memorial project with a nation that murdered my grandparents. In 2007, I reclaimed my Aust...
This paper will focus on the mobilities and stabilities of the traditions and cultural heritage, which are visible in human relationships with the nature and in the activities of the Archipelago National Park in Southwest Finland. I will present the characteristics of cultural heritage that Archipelago National Park gives to these relationships, in relation to the traditions of identifications to the archipelago by local people. Nature is the element that ties people most strongly to their...
In Europe, there has been a growing trend of strengthening the role of cultural heritage values in environmental discussions, policies, and management plans, which have traditionally been dominated by ecological and economic perspectives. Inter-governmental, inter-sectorial, and transdisciplinary collaboration together with the development of holistic approaches for research and management have been encouraged and developed on international and national levels in order to respond to the sc...