Passer au contenu de la page principale

Rights-Based Approaches to Heritage Management: Possibilities and Limitations

Mon statut pour la session

Quoi:
Regular session
Quand:
13:30, Mardi 7 Juin 2016 (3 heures 30 minutes)
Thème:
Heritage Changes Rights
Mots-clés:
Heritage changes rightsJustice and heritageHeritage and the lawRight to heritage
State dominance in heritage management has been a key area of attention in critical heritage studies. There is now a large body of work discussing how this dominance may result in the prioritization of national perspectives and interests over local ones and contribute to the marginalization of alternative interpretations of heritage by ethnic and religious minorities, immigrants and Indigenous peoples. Conflicts often arise between these groups and state authorities over how to manage heritage, by whom, and for what reasons. Heritage practice was rarely concerned with local participation to decision-making processes in the past.  This has begun to change recently, as the rights of local people in controlling and maintaining their heritage have been increasingly recognized in the area of heritage conservation. A number of key global heritage organizations such as ICOMOS, IUCN and UNESCO are moving toward adopting rights-based approaches for a more democratic, bottom-up and conflict-free heritage management. Indigenous peoples across the globe are now effectively using the language of rights as a political tactic to manage their heritage (Logan 2013:40). This session aims to bring together research that explores the possibilities and limitations of rights-based approaches in democratizing heritage management. It invites contributions that draw on a wide range of empirical cases from across disciplines and welcomes discussions on questions such as:
• What do heritage rights involve? How are they translated into conservation policy and practice at a local, national and/or international level?
• In what ways do heritage rights complement or collide with other socio-economic, cultural and political rights (property rights, freedom of religion and expression, women’s and minority rights, and so forth)? 
•  (How) do rights-based approaches contribute toward a bottom-up heritage identification, protection and management? In what ways could they be put into work in overcoming state dominance in heritage management and in resolving heritage conflicts?

Dr. Bahar Aykan

Modérateur.rice

Sous sessions

13:30 - 14:00 | 30 minutes

The 2003 UNESCO Convention on ICH Safeguarding (ICHC) remains the primary instrument in the international protection of intangible cultural heritage (ICH). Under the Convention, safeguarding responsibilities are incumbent upon the states parties. However, the Convention acknowledges the central role of the communities. Article 15 stipulates that the communities who create, maintain, and transmit elements of ICH must be ensured “the widest possible participation” by the state in the managem...

13:30 - 14:00 | 30 minutes

The aim of this paper is to reflect, from an historical perspective, on the ways the 1972 UNESCO World Heritage Convention opened a new space to the dispute over Jerusalem's Old City's heritage conservation and definition. What role does UNESCO's universalizing heritage construct play in a contested city, such as Jerusalem? How are UNESCO's universalizing heritage discourses used by different actors to show hegemonic power or political resistance? The critical heritage literature h...

13:30 - 14:00 | 30 minutes

This paper will discuss the protection of intangible cultural heritage through the case study of a form of Malay literature known as “Pantun.” It will focus on the national treatment by Indonesia and Malaysia in protecting this form of heritage. Pantun, in a narrow definition, refers to Malay folk poetry consisting of quatrains where the first two lines and the subsequent two lines are unrelated in terms of the meaning conveyed, and the purpose of the earlier two lines is only to provide r...

Diyana Sulaiman

Participant.e
13:30 - 14:00 | 30 minutes

This paper will explore rights-based heritage activism as a rising phenomenon in contemporary Turkey. It will do so by looking at two recent grassroots heritage campaigns against the state-led construction projects in the historic Sulukule district of Istanbul and the ancient town of Hasankeyf in Turkey’s southeast. Both places are officially recognized as protected sites, and the former even lies on Istanbul’s historic peninsula that was inscribed on the UNESCO World Heritage list in 1985...

Dr. Bahar Aykan

Participant.e
13:30 - 14:00 | 30 minutes

Beginning with the 1906 Antiquities Act, the United States government regulated the nation’s cultural past as steward on behalf of all Americans. Indigenous culture, tradition, and law were not recognized and “archaeological resources”—including Native human remains and grave sites—remained federally-owned property until the 1990 Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA).   Premised on “cultural affiliation,” NAGPRA granted, to specific “federally-recognized” ...

Hilary Soderland

Participant.e

Mon statut pour la session

Évaluer

Detail de session
Pour chaque session, permet aux participants d'écrire un court texte de feedback qui sera envoyé à l'organisateur. Ce texte n'est pas envoyé aux présentateurs.
Afin de respecter les règles de gestion des données privées, cette option affiche uniquement les profils des personnes qui ont accepté de partager leur profil publiquement.

Les changements ici affecteront toutes les pages de détails des sessions