Skip to main page content

Exploring the Scope of Flow in a Language Learning Context: Redefining the Dimensions Based on Student Perspectives

My Session Status

What:
Affiche scientifique | Poster
When:
15:00, Wednesday 27 Apr 2022 EDT (15 minutes)
Themes:
InclusivityEnglish
Tags:
FlowFacteurs affectifs

Exploring the Scope of Flow in a Language Learning Context: Redefining the Dimensions Based on Student Perspectives

Anamaria Bodea

Concordia University

 

Click on the 7-minute video presentation here.

Zoom 835 9632 5976

This study examines the concept of flow (i.e., a perceived state of harmony in terms of enjoyment and concentration in an activity, to the point of oblivion of the surrounding environment) in a second language (L2) learning context, focusing on the student’s perspective. Flow states have been previously found to correlate with increased engagement (e.g., Cox & Montgomery, 2019) or motivation (e.g., Abbott, 2000) in the classroom. The overall goal of this research is to inform L2 instructors and students on which specific characteristics might be desirable to focus on in the classroom, so as to provide flow opportunities while learning an L2.

Previous research about flow in L2 learning has focused on four dimensions of flow, as established by Egbert (2003), including learners’ attention, interest, control, and perceived skill-challenge balance. However, most studies have explored these dimensions through researcher-proposed descriptions of flow to which L2 learners were asked to react using Likert-type scales. This study focuses on establishing emerging dimensions as reported by the students themselves through journal entries and interviews, in order to portray a holistic picture of flow dimensions in L2 learning, which could potentially be used to encourage flow experiences while learning.

The results of the study suggest that additionally to the dimensions from the literature, new dimensions were emergent as relevant to the students’ flow experiences (e.g., oblivion, stress, enjoyment, and sense of accomplishment). Moreover, the flow experiences of students were mostly related to oral communication (e.g., speaking to a friend/stranger, conversation task).

 

References

Abbott, J. A., (2000). “Blinking out” and “having the touch”: Two fifth-grade boys talk about flow experiences in writing. Written Communication, 17(1), 53-92. https://doi-org.lib-ezproxy.concordia.ca/10.1177/0741088300017001003

Abuhamdeh, S. (2020). Investigating the “flow” experience: Key conceptual and operational issues. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00158

Aubrey, S. (2017a). Inter-cultural contact and flow in a task-based Japanese EFL classroom. Language Teaching Research, 21(6), 717-734. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168816683563

Aubrey, S. (2017b). Measuring flow in the EFL classroom: Learners’ perceptions of inter- and intra-cultural task-based interactions. TESOL Quarterly, 51(3), 661-692. https://doi-org.lib-ezproxy.concordia.ca/10.1002/tesq.387

Azizi, Z. & Ghonsooly, B. (2015). Exploring flow theory in TOEFL texts: Expository and argumentative genre. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 6(1), 210-215. http://dx.doi.org/10.17507/jltr.0601.26

Borovay, L. A., Shore, B. M., Caccese, C., Yang, E., & Hua, O. (2019). Flow, achievement level, and inquiry-based learning. Journal of Advanced Academics, 30(1), 74-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X18809659

Cho, M. (2018). Task complexity and modality: Exploring learners’ experience from the perspective of flow. The Modern Language Journal, 102(1), 162-180. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/modl.12460

Cox, C. B., & Montgomery, C. (2019). A study of 21st century skills and engagement in a university Spanish foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 52(4), 822-849. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12426

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. Josey-Bass Publishers.

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper Perennial. 

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Applications of flow in human development and education: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9094-9

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2014). Flow. Flow and the foundation of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 227-236)Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Montijo, N. M., & Mouton, A. R. (2018). Flow theory: Optimizing elite performance in the creative realm. In S. I. Pfeiffer, E. Shaunessy-Dedrick, & M. Foley-Nicpon (Eds.), APA handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 215–229). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000038-014

Egbert, J. (2003). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. The Modern Language Journal, 87(4), 499-518. https://doi-org.lib-ezproxy.concordia.ca/10.1111/1540-4781.00204

Garces-Bacsal, R. M. (2013). Finding flow in artistic skill and technique: Narratives of young artists-in-training in Singapore. In C.-H. Lum (Ed.), Contextualized practices in arts education: An international dialogue on Singapore (pp. 191-210). Springer. https://doi-org.lib-ezproxy.concordia.ca/10.1007/978-981-4560-55-9_18

Guan, X. (2013). A study on flow theory and translation teaching in China’s EFL class. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4(4), 785-790. https://doi.org/0.4304/jltr.4.4.785-790

Hong, J.-C., Hwang, M.-Y., Tai, K.-H., & Lin, P.-H. (2017). Intrinsic motivation of Chinese learning in predicting online learning self-efficacy and flow experience relevant to students’ learning process. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(6), 552-574. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1329215

Hood, M. S. (2008). A description of the relationship of flow theory and effective teaching of reading. (Publication No. AAI3289797) [Doctoral dissertation, University of Houston]. ProQuest Information and Learning Company. 

Hyers, L. L. (2018). Diary methods: Understanding qualitative research. Oxford University Press.

Ilies, R., Wagner, D., Wilson, K., Ceja, L., Johnson, M., DeRue, S., & Ilgen, D. (2017). Flow at work and basic psychological needs: Effects on well-being. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 66(1), 3-24. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12075 

Jackson, S. A. (1992). Athletes in flow: A qualitative investigation of flow states in elite figure skaters. Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 4(2), 161-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/10413209208406459

Jackson, S. A. (1996). Toward a conceptual understanding of the flow experience in elite athletes. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 67(1), 76-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1996.10607928

Kirchhoff, C. (2013). L2 extensive reading and flow: Clarifying the relationship. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(2), 192-212. 

Liu, C.-C., Wang, P.-C., & Tai, S.-J. D. (2016). An analysis of student engagement patterns in language learning facilitated by web 2.0 technologies. ReCALL, 28(2), 104-122. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834401600001X

MacDonald, R., Byrne, C., & Carlton, L. (2006). Creativity and flow in musical composition: An empirical investigation. Psychology of Music, 34(3), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1177/0305735606064838

Mcquillan, J., & Conde, G. (1996). The conditions of flow in reading: Two studies of optimal experience. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 17(2), 109-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271960170201 

Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The concept of flow. Flow and the foundation of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pp. 239-163)Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8

Olčar, D., Rijavec, M., & Golub, T. L. (2019). Primary school teachers’ life satisfaction: The role of life goals, basic psychological needs and flow at work. Current Psychology, 38, 320-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-017-9611-y 

Sinnamon, S., Moran, A., & O’Connell, M. (2012). Flow among musicians: Measuring peak experiences of student performers. Journal of Research in Music Education, 60(1), 6-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022429411434931

Stemler, S. (2000). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 7, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.7275/z6fm-2e34

Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage Publications, Inc.

Williams, M., & Moser, T. (2019). The art of coding and thematic exploration in qualitative research. International Management Review, 15(1), 45-55. 

My Session Status

Send Feedback

Session detail
Allows attendees to send short textual feedback to the organizer for a session. This is only sent to the organizer and not the speakers.
To respect data privacy rules, this option only displays profiles of attendees who have chosen to share their profile information publicly.

Changes here will affect all session detail pages